Workforce planning 13 November 2026

    What does an overstaffed shift cost?

    Three casual staff waiting at an empty cloakroom while the arena fills up (AI-generated).AI generated

    Better two people too many than one too few. In many event and catering businesses this is everyday practice, and it feels sensible. An empty bar on a concert night is visible, loud and embarrassing. Three people looking at their phones at cloakroom 2, or being sent home after an hour, go unnoticed. They still get paid.

    In short

    • Anyone who turns up and isn't needed costs at least the minimum paid shift length. At 4 hours that is around €78 per person, including employer contributions.
    • A business with 50 casual staff can save around €21,000 a year by planning reserve staff with data instead of gut feeling.
    • With 200 casual staff it is around €84,000 a year, or a good €230 every single day.
    • Overstaffing is usually insurance against uncertainty. If you know your no-show rate, you need far less of it.

    €78

    per surplus person

    €21,060

    savings per year with 50 casual staff

    €84,240

    savings per year with 200 casual staff

    The calculation: one person too many

    In practice, a surplus worker rarely stays for the whole shift. They are sent home, but the agreed minimum paid shift length is still paid. In many event and catering businesses that is 4 hours. For on-call work, the law requires at least 3 consecutive hours unless otherwise agreed.

    From 1 January 2027 the statutory minimum wage in Germany is €14.60 per hour. Event and catering businesses often pay a little more. We therefore calculate with €15 per hour. For commercial mini-jobs the employer pays a flat rate of up to 31.17 % on top, plus accident insurance. For simplicity we use a factor of 1.3.

    ItemValue
    Hourly wage€15.00
    Minimum paid shift length4 hours
    Wages€60.00
    Employer contributions (factor 1.3)+ €18.00
    Cost per surplus person€78.00

    €78 is the lower limit. If the person stays for the whole shift because “you might still need someone”, at 6 hours they already cost €117.

    €78 doesn't sound like much. It gets interesting when you scale the figure up to a whole business.

    Scaled up: 50 and 200 casual staff compared

    We compare two typical businesses: an event caterer with 50 casual staff and an arena or trade fair operator with 200 casual staff. On average each person works 6 shifts a month, which fits well with the mini-job earnings limit.

    Both businesses plan their reserve staff in two ways:

    • By gut feeling: invite a flat 15 % more people than needed.
    • Data-based: the actual no-show rate is 5 %. Add a small safety margin, giving about 7.5 % reserve staff in total.

    With a 5 % no-show rate, the gut-feeling buffer leaves around 10 % of people standing around for nothing. With data-based reserve staff it is only about 2.5 %.

    Coin stacks compared: with 50 casual staff around €21,060 can be saved per year, with 200 casual staff around €84,240. Every surplus person costs €78.
    Annual savings with data-based reserves: approx. €21,060 with 50 casual staff, approx. €84,240 with 200.
    50 casual staff200 casual staff
    Shifts per year3,60014,400
    Surplus assignments by gut feeling (10 %)3601,440
    Cost by gut feeling€28,080€112,320
    Surplus assignments data-based (2.5 %)90360
    Cost data-based€7,020€28,080
    Savings per year€21,060€84,240
    … per month€1,755€7,020
    … per day€58€231

    For context:

    • At the caterer with 50 casual staff, a good €1,700 stands around at the cloakroom every month. That is roughly one extra part-time employee who never appears on the roster.
    • At the arena operator with 200 casual staff, around €230 goes every day into assignments nobody needed, even on days without an event. Over the year that is more than a full-time position in dispatching costs.

    On top of that comes an item that appears on no payslip: coordination. Every surplus worker has to be requested, confirmed, briefed, reminded and finally signed off again. How much office time that takes in your business is shown by our savings calculator.

    And the other side: what does one person too few cost?

    To be fair, the other side belongs in the calculation too. If a bar is one person short, queues form. Some guests don't even join the queue. A simple model:

    Lost revenue = missing staff × hours × revenue per person and hour × share that is actually lost

    An example with assumptions: one person at the bar generates €250 in revenue per hour. If they are missing for three hours and a third of that is lost, that is around €250. That is more than the €78 for a surplus person. Which is exactly why businesses like to top up.

    The point is not that reserve staff are wrong. The point is: without data, nobody knows how much reserve is needed. Then “a little buffer” quickly turns into a fixed surcharge.

    Why we systematically plan too many

    Behavioural economics has a name for it: loss aversion. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed that losses weigh psychologically about twice as heavily as gains of the same size. We experience understaffing as a loss: guests are annoyed, the team is stressed, customers complain. The €78 saved, on the other hand, is an abstract gain, and it is spread invisibly across the whole year.

    Then there is uncertainty. If you don't know whether 38 or 32 of 40 confirmed people will show up, you plan for the worst case out of caution. That caution costs money every evening.

    Reserve staff with data instead of gut feeling

    Gut feeling vs. data for 40 positions: a flat 15 % more people means €312 extra cost, data-based reserve staff only €78 – a saving of €234 per event.
    Gut feeling vs. data for 40 positions: €312 extra cost with a flat 15 % buffer, €78 with a data-based reserve.

    The same principle on a small scale, for a single event with 40 positions and a 5 % no-show rate:

    ApproachReserve staffOf whom on site for nothingExtra cost
    Gut feeling: flat +15 %6 people4 people€312
    Data-based: no-show rate 5 % + 1 person safety margin3 people1 person€78

    Simply knowing the no-show rate cuts the extra cost by €234 per event. It takes three metrics:

    1. Response rate: how many of those asked have made a decision at all?
    2. No-show rate: how many confirmations are cancelled at short notice or not honoured, broken down by event type?
    3. Reliability per person: who confirms and actually comes, and who tends not to?

    How to measure such metrics is described in our post The 7 key workforce planning metrics.

    How SMARTCHILLI helps

    • PULS shows live for each event how many positions are filled, how many of those asked have already decided and how many further confirmations can realistically still be expected. Reserve staff are planned explicitly there rather than silently added on top.
    • Voluntary confirmations by swipe ensure that only people who really want to work are scheduled.
    • The hours alert shows who is already close to the mini-job limit. That matters so replacement staff don't exceed the limit (mini-jobs 2027).

    Conclusion

    A surplus person costs €78. With 50 casual staff that adds up to more than €20,000 a year, with 200 casual staff to more than €80,000. The lever is not to plan more tightly but more precisely: if you know your no-show rate, you use reserve staff in a targeted way and save the rest.

    How much could your business save? Calculate your savings potential in two minutes, without registration.

    FAQ

    Surplus people × paid hours × hourly wage × factor for employer contributions. Anyone sent home costs at least the agreed minimum paid shift length. For commercial mini-jobs the flat-rate contributions are up to 31.17 %, plus accident insurance.
    Yes, but the agreed minimum paid shift length usually still has to be paid. For on-call work without an agreed daily duration, that is at least 3 consecutive hours. The details depend on the contract.
    In our worked example around €21,000 (50 casual staff) or around €84,000 per year (200 casual staff), if reserve staff are planned based on data rather than with a flat surcharge.
    As much as your actual no-show rate for this type of event requires, plus a small safety margin. A flat surcharge is almost always too high.
    Response rate, no-show rate by event type and reliability per person.

    As of: November 2026. The example values (hourly wage €15, minimum paid shift length 4 hours, 6 shifts per person per month, no-show rate 5 %, revenue per person) are assumptions for illustration. This post does not replace legal advice in individual cases.

    Share

    Ready to drop the gut feeling?

    Try SMARTCHILLI free for one month and experience scheduling without guesswork.

    Book a live demo

    Comments

    0/1000
    Swipe right: I am human
    • No comments yet – be the first!

    More posts